Home
BSA Legal Blawg
Podcasts
Seminar Video
What the Jamboree is all about
Tribute to the Military
Scouting Video
Ninth Circuit Appeal
Core Values
Litigation
Access to Government Forums Cases
"Duty to God" Cases
"Morally Straight" Cases
Gender Cases
Documents
FAQs
What Others Are Saying
Five Ways to Help Online
Contact Information
Preparing Young People to Make Ethical and Moral Choices Over Their Lifetimes
Boy Scouts of America National Council
Search | Site Map | Print A   A
Boy Scouts of America Legal Issues Website & Blawg
Home
BLAWG
Multimedia
Core Values
Litigation
Documents
FAQs
What Others Are Saying
How Can I Help?
Contact Information

 

BSA RSS Feed
 

RSS News Readers













See official statements below
after news and commentary...

News and Commentary

12/9/2004
Boy Scouts and Declaration of Independence under Attack
by George C. Landrith
OpinionEditorials.com


12/8/2004
Oath under assault

by Christopher Stollar
The Washington Times

12/7/2004
DoD Support for Boy Scouts to Continue, Rumsfeld Says
by Donna Miles
American Forces Press Service

Anti-Civil Liberties Union
by Joseph Farah
WorldNetDaily.com


12/6/2004
Bill O'Reilly-Sec. Donald Rumsfeld Interview
The O'Reilly Factor
Fox News Channel

The Battle for the Boy Scouts
by Hans Zeiger
IntellectualConservative.com

Letter from Secretary Rumsfeld to Senator Frist

Letter from Senator Conrad Burns to Secretary Rumsfeld


12/3/2004
The ACLU Saves the Boy Scouts from God
by Cinnamon Stillwell and Lee Kaplan
FrontPageMagazine.com


12/2/2004
In Defense of the Scouts
Editorial
The Washington Times

Why not tolerate Boy Scouts?
Editorial
The Illinois Leader

12/1/2004
The Boy Scouts, The Constitution And America’s Survival

by Mary Mostert
American Daily

11/27/2004
Another American Institution Under Attack
by Darrell Huckaby
Rockdale Citizen


11/26/2004
Bashing the Boy Scouts
Editorial
The Wall Street Journal


11/25/2004
Thankful for the Boy Scouts?
by Jane Chastain
WorldNetDaily.com

Rumsfeld supports Scouts meeting on military bases
by Rowan Scarborough
The Washington Times


11/24/2004
Boy Scout ruling a hollow victory for the ACLU
by Al Knight
Denver Post


11/22/2004
Nelson in Panhandle assures Boy Scouts
of military links

by Bill Kaczor
Associated Press

Standing with the Scouts
Letters to the Editor
New York Post

Obnoxious busybodies
Editorial
The Pueblo Chieftain

Restricting Scout's Honor
by Daniel Bagley
The Cavalier Daily


11/21/2004
Frist "Save Our Scouts" Bill Fails
Chattanoogan.com

ACLU "Defends" Freedom By Opposing Boy Scouts
by Joe Bell
OpinionEditorials.com


11/20/2004
House Condemns Criticism of Boy Scouts
by Jim Abrams
Associated Press

House Resolution Supporting Boy Scouts


11/19/2004
Keeping us safe from Boy Scouts
by James Lileks
Dallas Morning News


11/18/2004
ACLU settlement allows DoD to continue Boy Scout support
Army News Service

Damning the Scouts
by Collin Levey
New York Post

Rumsfeld urged to 'defend' Scouts movement
by Rowan Scarborough
The Washington Times

Secular Jihad
Editorial
Investors Business Daily


11/17/2004

How to Make Blue Folks See Red: Pick on the Boy Scouts
by James Lileks
Newhouse News Service

Boy Scouts Jamboree to Stay at Army base
by Jon Ward and Arlo Wagner
The Washington Times

Scouting activities will go on despite Pentagon sponsorship reminder
by Ben Murray
Stars and Stripes


11/16/2004

Boy Scouts can't have military support,
Associated Press

Chicago Tribune
 
 
Statements below from
the Boy Scouts of America
and the Department of Justice
 
11/16/2004

Statement by the Boy Scouts of America
Regarding the Settlement Between
the ACLU and the Department of Defense

We understand that the Department of Defense intends to remind all military entities that they may not sponsor or charter traditional Boy Scout units.  We have directed our local councils to work with the unit leadership to find an alternative non-governmental chartering organization, such as a VFW Post or American Legion.  This settlement will have no impact on Scouts or their families. Boy Scouts will be able to use military bases as meeting places and for other functions such as camping on the same basis as any other citizen group.  This will not have any effect on plans for the BSA Jamboree next summer.


Statement by the Department of Justice

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2004 (202) 514-2008
WWW.USDOJ.GOV TDD (202) 514-1888

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SETTLES
PART OF LITIGATION CHALLENGING
ITS INVOLVEMENT WITH
THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The parties to a case challenging the federal government's longstanding support for the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) have voluntarily settled the claim challenging the "sponsorships" of Boy Scout organizations by the Department of Defense, the Justice Department announced today. The settlement clarifies that existing DOD policy precludes official sponsorship of private organizations, but that DOD personnel may continue to sponsor such organizations in their personal capacity. The settled claim was one of several challenging a range of support provided by the federal government to the Boy Scouts.

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit claim that the Departments of Defense and Housing and Urban Development violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution by spending appropriated funds in support of the Boy Scouts. The settlement has no effect on the challenge to DOD's support-as opposed to sponsorship-of the Boy Scouts or on any of the claims against HUD. In entering into the partial settlement agreement, DOD admitted no wrongdoing and expressly denied that it sponsors BSA organizations and, even if the Department of Defense were to sponsor BSA organizations, that any such sponsorship would violate the Establishment Clause.

The partial settlement agreement merely clarifies the Department's pre-existing policy regarding sponsorship of private organizations. Under existing policy, DOD may not, and does not officially sponsor any private, non-federal organizations, including Boy Scout units. This policy prohibits department personnel from sponsoring any private, non-federal organizations in their official capacity. Under the terms of the partial settlement agreement, the Department of Defense will communicate to military bases that, consistent with department policy, they may not sponsor Boy Scout units and department personnel may not sponsor Boy Scout units in an official capacity.

Department personnel may continue to be involved with scouting in their personal capacity. Nothing in the partial settlement agreement is intended to preclude DOD support to the Boy Scouts authorized by DOD policy, to preclude Boy Scout activities on DOD bases and installations, or to preclude DOD personnel in their personal capacity from sponsoring Boy Scout units.

Provided there is no sponsorship by Department of Defense personnel in an official capacity, Boy Scout units are permitted to meet on military bases and military personnel are permitted to remain active in Boy Scout programs. The settlement does not diminish the level of support provided to the Boy Scouts by DOD. The Department of Defense has defended the legality of such support in briefs filed with the district court in this case, and that issue will ultimately be decided by the court in the course of the resolution of the pending motions for summary judgment.

As the federal government argued as a friend of the court in a separate action involving the City of San Diego's leasing of public land to the Boy Scouts, the government has argued here that the Boy Scouts is not a religious institution, but rather achieves its objectives of developing good character, citizenship, and personal fitness in young boys by focusing on a vigorous program of outdoor activities.

###


 

Copyright 2006 on behalf of the Boy Scouts of America